Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during a public gathering in Patliputra, Bihar, took a strong stance against the Congress party for their decision to change the laws related to minority institutions. He alleged that these changes were made hastily overnight to cater to their vote bank, leading to the declaration of thousands of institutions as minority institutions.
The Prime Minister emphasized that before these changes, Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) used to enjoy full reservations during admission to these institutions.
His comments come at a time when reservation policies in India are a topic of heated debate. Currently, around 60% of seats in government jobs and higher educational institutions are reserved for various sections like ST, SC, OBC, and Economically Weaker Sections (EWS).
However, the Supreme Court has ruled that SC/ST/OBC reservation does not apply to minority educational institutions. The government cannot impose such institutions to provide reservations to SC/ST/OBC candidates. This ruling has sparked a debate over the balance between minority rights and social justice.
The Congress-led government in 1981 made amendments to the laws governing minority institutions, including granting minority status to Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) among others. However, the Supreme Court has stated that these amendments did not bestow the “complete minority character” on AMU.
The Prime Minister’s comments have stirred the ongoing discussion on the intricate relationship between minority rights and affirmative action in India. The resolution of this debate could have far-reaching implications for the future of educational policies in India.
